Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ranah Akua Stoiber vs Madison Sieg Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Stoiber vs Sieg analysis and find out who is favored!
Ranah Akua Stoiber vs Madison Sieg Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Stoiber 0 - 0 Sieg
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Stoiber has won 44.51% of points on his second serve, while Sieg has won 45.16%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Stoiber, in recent form, has won 58% of his opponent's second serve points, while Sieg has won 53.21%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.98% and 40.04% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Stoiber has saved 54.65% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Sieg has saved 51.38% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Stoiber has won 53.85% of matches played (W/L 21/ 18), with Sieg winning 57.58% (W/L 38/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Stoiber has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 2/ 1), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 38% (W/L 3/ 5). Sieg has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 62% (W/L 8/ 5), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 47/ 37).
- Player level: In the last year, Stoiber has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 51.85% of matches (W/L 14/ 13), where as Sieg has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.46% of matches (W/L 38/ 27). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Stoiber has played against opponents with an average rank of 256.08 while Sieg has played against players with an average rank of 276.52.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Stoiber has won 33% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Sieg has won 64% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Stoiber has converted 58.24% of breakpoint opportunities, and Sieg has converted 52.84% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Stoiber 0 - 0 Sieg
639
Rank
617
High
18
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
326
Rank
326
High
20
Age
Plays
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
52% (32-30)
Career Total W/L
57% (79-60)
62% (8-5)
YTD W/L
46% (11-13)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ranah Akua Stoiber | Madison Sieg |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 62% (8/5) | 46% (11/13) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 64% (18/10) | 46% (24/28) |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (141/111) | 47% (228/253) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 29% (2/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 53% (8/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (8/4) | 50% (1/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.43 | 0.08 |
| Aces Total | 53 | 18 |
| DFs per game | 0.05 | 0.31 |
| DFs Total | 6 | 72 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:16:41 | 1:49:27 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 316.69 | 241.63 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (415/695) | 67% (1070/1597) |
| 1st Serve W% | 72% (299/415) | 56% (600/1070) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 43% (121/280) | 45% (238/527) |
| BPs Won% Total | 58% (42/73) | 53% (93/176) |
| Return Pts W% | 47% (316/666) | 45% (672/1499) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 62% (8/5) | 48% (11/12) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (8/12) | 43% (10/23) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 60% (3/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (1/3) | 40% (2/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (7/7) | 91% (11/10) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (7/0) | 9% (11/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 17% (6/1) | 8% (13/1) |
Ranah Akua Stoiber Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats 
Nadine Keller
Player
Ranah Akua Stoiber
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve %
65%
(
17 of
26)
0
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
73%
(
11 of
15)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
0%
(
0 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
45%
(
9 of
20)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
27
Total Points Won
19
|
5-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Antonia Ruzic
Player
Ranah Akua Stoiber
62%
(
54 of
87)
1st Serve %
60%
(
46 of
77)
2
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
0
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
46%
(
40 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
37 of
77)
84
Total Points Won
80
|
6-2 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ranah Akua Stoiber
Player
Katarina Stresnakova
54%
(
53 of
98)
1st Serve %
73%
(
80 of
109)
8
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
51 of
80)
53%
(
24 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
34%
(
33 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
42 of
109)
107
Total Points Won
100
|
4-6 7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ranah Akua Stoiber
Player
Mara Guth
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve %
66%
(
45 of
68)
7
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
43%
(
30 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
40 of
68)
79
Total Points Won
58
|
6-1 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ranah Akua Stoiber
Player
Teodora Prisadnikova
52%
(
22 of
42)
1st Serve %
50%
(
15 of
30)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
80%
(
24 of
30)
53
Total Points Won
19
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Katarina Stresnakova
Player
Ranah Akua Stoiber
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
55%
(
45 of
82)
2
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
1
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
35 of
45)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
37)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
75
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Sonay Kartal
Player
Ranah Akua Stoiber
70%
(
66 of
94)
1st Serve %
49%
(
35 of
71)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
45%
(
42 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
88
Total Points Won
77
|
6-0 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ranah Akua Stoiber
Player
Valentina Ryser
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve %
54%
(
33 of
61)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
6
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Madison Sieg Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Gergana Topalova
Player
Madison Sieg
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
12%
(
3 of
26)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
29 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
78
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Madison Sieg
Player
Daria Yesypchuk
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
86%
(
44 of
51)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Madison Sieg
Player
Merel Hoedt
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
45%
(
28 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hikaru Sato
Player
Madison Sieg
51%
(
57 of
111)
1st Serve %
79%
(
75 of
95)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
41 of
75)
50%
(
27 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
44%
(
49 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
46 of
95)
108
Total Points Won
98
|
7-6(6) 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Madison Sieg
Player
Jaquelyn Ogunwale
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve %
53%
(
19 of
36)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
54
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Johanne Svendsen
Player
Madison Sieg
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve %
73%
(
60 of
82)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
33%
(
7 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
6 of
6)
48%
(
32 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
44 of
82)
79
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Madison Sieg
Player
Elena-Teodora Cadar
67%
(
46 of
69)
1st Serve %
87%
(
75 of
86)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
86)
82
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Solana Sierra
Player
Madison Sieg
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve %
65%
(
28 of
43)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
53
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Madison Sieg
Player
Ana Candiotto
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
70%
(
32 of
46)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
0
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carolina Meligeni Alves
Player
Madison Sieg
54%
(
36 of
67)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
69)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
7
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
78
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stoiber Vs Sieg Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
